HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS: Pumping Costs for PVC and Ductile Iron Pipe
This paper critically examines the hydraulic performance claims made by the Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association (DIPRA) regarding ductile iron (DI) pipes, specifically concerning energy efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability in comparison to polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes. DIPRA suggests that DI pipes, with their larger inside diameter (ID), lower pumping costs when compared to PVC. However, this analysis reveals that DIPRA's calculations and materials contain misleading data and unfounded assumptions, resulting in skewed comparisons that do not reflect the real-world performance of these materials. Key Areas of Analysis 1. Inside Diameter Comparison DIPRA’s comparisons often pair DI pipes with larger ID and lower pressure classes against higher-pressure class PVC pipes, leading to inaccurate efficiency claims. An equivalent pressure class (PC) should be considered in such comparisons. For example, DIPRA compares DI PC200 with PVC PC235, which inherently has a sma...